This unique book faithfully represents what atheists say they believe about the nature of God, evil, and human autonomy and stands back to watch as the natural inconsistencies in that worldview inevitably rise to the surface. Anyone who wants to be able to speak with confidence to an atheist about the fundamental conflicts in their beliefs will find this resource indispensable. A must-have for your library. McDowell , author and speaker "By allowing the atheists themselves to do the talking, Geisler and McCoy repeatedly catch these skeptics in their own humanistic nets.
Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, & Skeptics
Recommended especially for those who are interested in the current debates on the subject of the New Atheism. Habermas , Distinguished Research Professor and chair of the Department of Philosophy at Liberty University "Readers will find the information they need to better comprehend and communicate their faith both to skeptics and to believers who desire to share the reason for the hope within them.
Written in a clear, flowing style, this book is a model for Christian apologetics today. Highly recommended. Daniel J. It often seems to be assumed that Christians must answer the most pointed questions on these topics, but Geisler and McCoy take the offensive, emphasizing chiefly the need for atheists to think more clearly and especially to stop contradicting themselves. This volume is recommended especially for those who are interested in the current debates on the subject of the New Atheism.
- Living, Dying, Caring: Life and Death in a Nursing Home.
- The Decline of U.S. Labor Unions and the Role of Trade (Globalization Balance Sheet).
- Ebook A Friendly Letter to Skeptics and Atheists: Musings on Why God Is Good and Faith Isn't;
Gary R. Readers will find the information they need to better comprehend and communicate their faith both to skeptics and to believers who desire to share the reason for the hope within them. The message of the atheists contains two crucial points.
On the one hand, if there were a good God, he would make himself known far more clearly in the universe than the atheist is willing to acknowledge. The internet responds to the news in an instant. Consumers lack the patience to research an issue in depth, but they also want to feel smart; mistaking clever comedy for intelligent commentary, they turn to the satirists. Worse, they might turn to briefings by sites like Vox.
If this is how we learn about the news, it is little wonder that college and grad students believe that a blog or podcast can deliver the truth about God and reason. Curiously, this lack of depth makes witnessing to the new atheists very challenging. An atheist with a considered opinion can be reasoned with; but many members of the various online movements have had their minds muddled by Internet memes and celebrity soundbites. These ideas must be untangled carefully to make progress. To this end, Christians need to invest time prayerfully studying their own worldview and not relying on websites and online sermons!
We should learn how to answer the best- and the worst — objections offered by atheists. But to apply this knowledge, I would offer the following advice:.
Review of _Answers for Atheists, Agnostics, and Other Thoughtful Skeptics_
Fight Like a Farmer. One of the more appealing images in the Bible is that of the Christian soldier, fully equipped with the armor of God.
Spiritual combat sounds like a thrilling and ennobling calling—largely because it is. The imagery is not incompatible; every farmer is fighting a long, hard battle with his fields. Soil has to be broken down, weeds removed, borders established, and pests eradicated so that seed and animals can grow. And the farmer cannot win his war without patience, endurance, and wisdom. I think the public debates of William Lane Craig, John Lennox, and other Christian apologists are helpful because they provide a neutral, nonthreatening environment for sceptics to hear the gospel and to hear some of their objections aired and answered.
And, when we can, we must defend our faith from public challenges before the watching world. But I worry that some Christians see debates as a model for all our evangelism with atheists.
If you win a debate, you have proven you are quite good at debates; if you are very fortunate, you might also establish that your beliefs are not completely ridiculous. So when you are talking to sceptics, have the patience and foresight of a farmer.
If the atheist contends that science can explain the world, ask, Why do we live in a world that can be described by science? Why does nature obey laws? Why can those laws be comprehended by our minds? Surely everyone is rationally entitled to their own point of view in a God-less universe.
If a community makes and defends its own brand of righteousness, who is to say they are truly wrong?
Understanding the Atheist
If the atheist complains that the injustices of the world are too terrible to tell, point out that we must then choose between despair and hope. So who has more reason for despair: the Christian or the atheist? And remind your friend that we seek more than the absence of suffering.
Related Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved