Who would be in charge of said institutions and what would be the abiding concern of newly minted archives? Jadunath Sarkar weighed in on nearly all of these questions. His views were staunchly pro-colonial government, conservative, contemptuous of indigenous, subaltern historical modes like bakhars and determined to bar access to records for all but a chosen few.
Today, the discipline of history is inundated with Bengali historians mostly working on Calcutta and their fetishization of all things Bangla.
The Calling of History: Sir Jadunath Sarkar and His Empire of Truth, Chakrabarty
Tanika Sarkar characterizes Chakrabarty as a "cultural nationalist" and that charge seems justified by his latest work. Quoting liberally from Tagore and trying to fit Jadunath within a niche of European historiography, Chakrabarty strains the reader's patience. It is when the author steps gingerly out of his Bangla-centric comfort zone that potentially more interesting details emerge.
Specifically, bitter rivalries and clashing perspectives held by proponents of the two strands, Bengali and Marathi, are fascinating. Unfortunately, Chakrabarty gives the latter short shrift. Although modern Bangla historians often operate as if Bengal were a satellite of Europe, an earlier generation from which Jadunath Sarkar hailed was actively engaged with other regions--especially Maharashtra. During the late nineteenth century-early 20th c, Marathi historians and archivists were busy collecting manuscripts from remote villages, fighting with ordinary people who were hostile to a project that involved handing over their family letters, personal effects, et cetera.
These texts are priceless because they provide historians of South Asia with indigenous forms of history writing that conformed to protocols radically distinct from Rankean historical methods. Without them, we have little way of understanding the life-worlds of the millions of peasants who never appeared on the pages of court chroniclers.
Instead of wholesale dismissal of those methods like Sarkar, Chakrabarty might have explored how those modes enrich historical scholarship. He could have relied on his friend Ashis Nandy's article "History's Forgotten Doubles" and taken up where Prachi Deshpande left off in her chapter on bakhar historiography in Creative Pasts, noting Jadunath Sarkar's disgust with them as worthless for historians. Or even simpler--take seriously the claims made in Partha Chatterjee's introduction to his edited anthology History and the Vernacular. But that would have been draft 10 and what we are reading in Calling of History is draft 2.
Not a Marathi speaker himself, Chakrabarty leans heavily on Sarkar's English correspondence and traces his European literary influences. Unlike the current lot of modern US-based Bengali historians, Sarkar spoke many languages. His friendships may not have extended to Australia and US like Chakrabarty.
However, his lifelong friendship with a Marathi historian named Sardesai attest that these were deeper intellectual engagements than the ones his biographer draws upon largely male like Sarkar, upper-caste and Bengali.
New Book - The calling of history : Sir Jadunath Sarkar and his empire of truth
Sarkar was the more dominating personality who critiqued his colleague's writing and modes of historical scholarship. At some points, Sardesai would offer a defence by saying to his friend: "I am just a writer of kaifiyats. The author notes this but then does not give Sardesai's rebuttal its due, characterizing Sardesai and his contemporary Marathi historians as "regional chauvinists.
What would it have meant for an Indian writing under colonialism to make that claim, as against Sarkar's effort to mimic Europeans like Ranke? To be a kaifiyat was to be a locally rooted guardian of popular memory, accountable to the community in which one lived. It was a position prior to the professionalization of the discipline. While Sarkar was gushing over Gibbon and reading Macaulay, Sardesai was representing himself as a historian oriented towards a vernacular music, hard to detect for ears only accustomed to English.
The mimic man enjoyed patronage from the colonial authorities, his work is receiving a reappraisal from Western historians and now a respectful invitation into the canon from no less than a Toynbee-awarded professor. Meanwhile, the aspiring kaifiyat writer languishes in obscurity. All the time Chakrabarty is excavating the Anglo-European etymology of 'tragedy' and how Sarkar used it, it is this other tragedy that goes unremarked.
Jul 02, Partha rated it liked it. The conversation comes to a close as Sir Jadunath, now marginalized and forgotten, returns to his corner poignantly ruminating about present-day scholars and their treatment of the 'sources' of history. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. About Dipesh Chakrabarty. Dipesh Chakrabarty. Dipesh Chakrabarty is a Bengali historian who has also made contributions to postcolonial theory and subaltern studies. He attended Presidency College of the University of Calcutta, where he received his undergraduate degree in physics. Later he moved on to the Australian National University i Dipesh Chakrabarty is a Bengali historian who has also made contributions to postcolonial theory and subaltern studies.
You are here
He is currently the Lawrence A. Chakrabarty also serves as a contributing editor for Public Culture, an academic journal published by Duke University Press. He was a member of the Subaltern Studies collective. He has recently made important contributions to the intersections between history and postcolonial theory Provincializing Europe [PE] , which continues and revises his earlier historical work on working-class history in Bengal Rethinking Working-Class History.
PE adds considerably to the debate of how postcolonial discourse engages in the writing of history e. Young's "White Mythologies" , critiquing historicism, which is intimately related to the West's notion of linear time. Chakrabarty argues that Western historiography's historicism universalizes liberalism, projecting it to all ends of the map. A leading scholar in early twentieth-century India, Sir Jadunath Sarkar — was knighted in and became the first Indian historian to gain honorary membership in the American Historical Association. By the end of his lifetime, however, he had been marginalized by the Indian history establishment, as postcolonial historians embraced alternative approaches in the name of democracy and anti-colonialism.
Through close readings of more than twelve hundred letters to and from Sarkar along with other archival documents, Dipesh Chakrabarty demonstrates that historians in colonial India formulated the basic concepts and practices of the field via vigorous—and at times bitter and hurtful—debates in the public sphere. He furthermore shows that because of its non-technical nature, the discipline as a whole remains susceptible to pressure from both the public and the academy even today.
Methodological debates and the changing reputations of scholars like Sarkar, he argues, must therefore be understood within the specific contexts in which particular histories are written. Dipesh Chakrabarty is the Lawrence A. Reviews Review Policy. Published on. Flowing text, Original pages. Best For.
Discussing The Impact of Sabermetrics on Baseball
Web, Tablet, Phone, eReader. Content Protection. Read Aloud. Learn More. Flag as inappropriate. It syncs automatically with your account and allows you to read online or offline wherever you are. Please follow the detailed Help center instructions to transfer the files to supported eReaders. More related to historiography.
Book Review: The Calling of History: Sir Jadunath Sarkar and His Empire of Truth
See more. The Concept of Bharatavarsha and Other Essays.
This exploration of key terms related to social and political order, found in early Indian texts, challenges the idea of a unified ancient India and a unified national identity at that time. This collection explores what may be called the idea of India in ancient times. Its undeclared objective is to identify key concepts which show early Indian civilization as distinct and differently oriented from other formations. The essays focus on ancient Indian texts within a variety of genres.
Professor Chattopadhyaya examines these texts to unveil historical processes. Without denying comparative history, he stresses that the internal dynamics of a society are best decoded via its own texts. It punctures the retrospective thrust of hegemonic nationalism as an ideology that has obscured the diverse textures of Indian civilization.
John E. Special numbered leatherbound edition, signed by Dr. The interface of identity construction practices and the role of knowledge of the past in that continual process manifests itself in contemporary Hindu-Muslim relations and political governance. Presenting' the Past studies the religious, cultural, sociological, and ideological dimensions of the Hindutva historiographical project going back and forth into the realms of history, myth, socialization, and governance.
Romila Thapar. In a series of candid conversations, Romila Thapar, a widely read, discussed, and cited historian of our times, muses on a range of issues that impact history writing in modern India. Anecdotal and vibrant, each of these accounts reveals a rare understanding of history as a dialogue between the past and the present. The Past Before Us. The claim that India--uniquely among civilizations--lacks historical writing distracts us from a more pertinent question: how to recognize the historical sense of societies whose past is recorded in ways very different from European conventions.
Romila Thapar, a distinguished scholar of ancient India, guides us through a panoramic survey of the historical traditions of North India, revealing a deep and sophisticated consciousness of history embedded in the diverse body of classical Indian literature. The history recorded in such texts as the Ramayana and the Mahabharata is less concerned with authenticating persons and events than with presenting a picture of traditions striving to retain legitimacy amid social change.
Spanning an epoch from BCE to CE, Thapar delineates three strains of historical writing: an Itihasa-Purana tradition of Brahman authors; a tradition composed mainly by Buddhist and Jaina monks and scholars; and a popular bardic tradition.
Related The Calling of History: Sir Jadunath Sarkar and His Empire of Truth
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved